Thursday, May 15, 2008

 

Note To Opey: It's Not Always About You, Sweetie

Sometimes it's not about you, sweetie. Sometimes it's about other idiots, too.

President Bush, before the Knesset on the occasion of Israel's 60th birthday:

Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along . . . We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.
The Obamian One, with telling indignation:

It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel’s independence to launch a false political attack.
Yo, BH: Whether it was aimed at you or not, the shoe fits, pal. That's why you're so upset. F'n wear it.

White House Spokesgoddess Dana Perino to Obama:

I understand when you’re running for office you sometimes think the world revolves around you. Not today, Opey. It ain't lookin' good for tomorrow, either.
Idiots always get angry when someone points out their horribly piss-poor judgement, even when the person pointing it out is talking about others who happen to think the same way. Then they try to change the subject from their horribly piss-poor judgement to, what else, their victimhood, as in "stop attacking my patriotism!" which, translated, means "stop pointing out that I have horribly piss-poor judgement!" Today's example: Barack Hussein Obama calls Bush's historically unimpeachable observation a "false" attack on Him, The Obamian One.

Never mind that Bush didn't happen to be thinking of The Obamian One while addressing the Knesset on a historically significant occasion, although the Obamian One's vehement reaction, and that of his devotees, was certainly Shakespearean- exactly what is false about what Bush said? History is bursting with examples of the disastrous folly of trying to "reason" your country's sworn enemy out of a fight when that sworn enemy has promised you one no matter what you do. If it was as easy as Obama seems to think it is, we'd be there. That Obama thinks that way is demonstrative of the man's phenomenal hubris.

What is false is Obama's claim that he has "never supported engagement with terrorists." This is the guy who offers both in a debate and on his own campaign website as of today to negotiate with ActMadInJihad and Assad without preconditions. Those two countries are on the State list of terrorism-sponsoring nations. Note to Obama: those two assholes are terrorists. But Obama has a record of ignoring such "diversions"; for years Barack Hussein and Michelle Obama have had personal friends and dinner companions who are terrorists, the very people who launched his political career, but perhaps in the Obamian Mind hosting a meal at your home followed by an evening of polite discussion with people who bombed Americans and support the elimination of Israel does not constitute engagement with terrorists. That's almost as rich as spending twenty years at the Trinity Church and never hearing anti-American, anti-white racist rants by a Nation of Islam friend and mentor.

K-Lo has a list of modern appeasers ready at hand. Among them:
Dhimmi Carter
Nancy Pelosi
John Edwards
Bill Richardson
Henry Waxman
Dennis Kucinich
Chris Dodd
John F'n Kerry
Madeleine Albright

Appeasers all, they all travelled to kneel at the enemy's feet, only to return with yet more proof of the danger inherent in their worldview. There are certainly more, but what better modern example than Dhimmi Carter?

The problem is that like all those idiots, Obama thinks that if only he can get the chance, he will succeed where countless other idiots have failed to disastrous results.

Wrong. And nobody knows better just how wrong that is than the miraculous Israelis, or President Bush, who has given 50 million Muslim souls a chance for freedom because he knew it was folly to "talk" with Saddam and the Afghan Taliban.

Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?